Friday, September 20, 2019

Mailing List Sign-up

* indicates required

Oakmont News, Opinion & More

Our Annual Opportunity for a Better Oakmont

Thank you, Yvonne Frauenfelder, for your excellent, well-focused article regarding the precarious state of our situation (Oakmont – Transition 2019).  The comments made by Rick Feibusch to your article bring even more clarity to where we are and the plight we face.

Over the past 3 to 5 years, we witnessed the arrival of younger,  more well-heeled home purchasers. Many of them are looking to transform Oakmont into a more upscale, “hipper” community. And they want to do it NOW. Many of these new residents want to throw out evolution in favor of revolution. (i.e., the pickleball fiasco, the possible Taj Mahal to replace the Berger, etc).

They have little respect and very little empathy for the thousands of Oakmonters who came before them, many of whom are now quite elderly, living alone, with possible financial constraints.  One of our current OVA board members has been heard to say, on more than one occasion, “if they (our older generation) can’t afford to live here, let them move.”  How considerate and caring.

When Steve Spanier was elected President of the OVA, I called him to try to get some clarity as to what he envisioned for our community.  Politically adept, he gave me the usual political sales job without specifics, but with a vague overview.

One particular comment he made disturbed me. He said, “we have to get ready for all the people who will move here from the Silicon Valley”.  That sounds to me like revolution, not evolution.

Spanier also promised a new era of transparency.  One of the first things the Board did was to agree to spend  $182,000 on new audio visual equipment and window treatments for the East Rec remodel.  They authorized Iris Harrell to purchase it, which she did, without getting any competitive bids or proposals. When I heard about this I immediately contacted Spanier and urged him to postpone the purchase until other proposals could be obtained. He chose not to do so.

I supported Ellen Leznik because I believed she would right the wrongs of the Batchelor and Altman administrations. But a small band of disruptors, comprised mostly of newer arrivals, hounded her into resignation. Some of her most ugly, vocal detractors now sit on the OVA board.

This year, with OVA elections just around the corner, I am once again hopeful that we can refocus our efforts to keep OVA financially sound while charting an evolutionary path forward. If you agree, please consider running for election to our Board.

We don’t need Silicon Valley millionaires to make Oakmont great. It’s already Great!  We don’t need a multi-million dollar Taj Mahal to replace the Berger. We just need a caring Board with a well thought-out, fiscally responsible, evolving plan that will allow the vast majority of us to live out our lives in a wonderful place that everyone can enjoy – and afford.

 

Share this page:

5 Comments

  1. Sue Aiken on January 8, 2019 at 9:18 am

    Generational differences present real challenges as you have experienced and described. I suppose we can see this as a problem to rid ourselves of or an opportunity to move into the future. Since this community is open to anyone 55 or older we do not get to decide who lives here. Thank goodness! One of my reasons for moving here was the lack of a gated community meaning any and all can drive, walk, run and bike through our streets easily. My guests do not have to be allowed entrance through a front guard gate. It speaks of inclusiveness rather than elitism.
    So how can those already living here and potential new neighbors come together to learn and plan Oakmont’s future? Isn’t that the real question? I am pretty sure this isn’t the first time in its history that old and new residents have bumped heads. I am new as of last year and have much to learn but I hope my ideas can be heard and not pushed aside because I don’t have all the past history. This is a very common organizational situation which we can either take to the negative low road or to a positive inclusive road. I wonder if replacing board members each year is the answer due to lack of consistency, thus more opportunities for confusion. Are we open to hearing and learning from one another? Can we let go of right way and wrong way? Winners and losers? I choose to be hopeful.

  2. Elaine on January 8, 2019 at 10:09 am

    This part of Steve Edwards’ opinion piece, in particular, struck me.

    “When Steve Spanier was elected President of the OVA, I called him to try to get some clarity as to what he envisioned for our community. Politically adept, he gave me the usual political sales job without specifics, but with a vague overview.

    “One particular comment he made disturbed me. He said, ‘WE HAVE TO GET READY FOR ALL THE PEOPLE WHO WILL MOVE HERE FROM THE SILICON VALLEY.'” (CAPS used for emphasis.)

    My response is, why do we have to prepare for his/their target market of those coming from the Silicon Valley? We have never had trouble appealing to people from here in Sonoma County to people all across the Country.

  3. Thomas Hall on January 8, 2019 at 5:36 pm

    The only constant in life is change. There is no turning back the clock for anyone.

  4. fred nashawaty on January 10, 2019 at 10:24 am

    Steve, did you say a silly thing, or did you really mean rich Southerners are coming and we should be prepared?? I’ll give you the benefit of my doubt.

  5. Steve Edwards on January 11, 2019 at 7:15 am

    Fred, I never said that. Steve Spanier did. He mentioned “Silicon Valley” arrivals.

Leave a Comment




IMG_9427.JPG

Never miss an article

Sign-up for The Oakmont Observer email list to keep up to date.